Jump to content


Photo

First known 64 bit virus


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 NeonWizard

NeonWizard

    Security Geek

  • Full Member
  • Pip
  • 49 posts

Posted 27 May 2004 - 07:10 PM

Security technology company Symantec reported Thursday that it has analyzed what it believes to be the first known threat to 64-bit Windows systems, a virus labeled W64.Rugrat.3344.

Representatives at the Cupertino, Calif.-based company were quick to point out that the threat was merely a so-called proof-of-concept virus--a worm developed by someone to show that vulnerabilities are present in a particular type of system--and not a virus already spreading in the wild. However, Oliver Friedrichs, senior manager of Symantec's Security Response Team, said W64.Rugrat.3344 can attack 64-bit Microsoft Windows files successfully. He said the virus does not infect 32-bit files and will not run on 32-bit Windows systems.

Since 64-bit systems have yet to proliferate widely, Symantec maintains that the virus does not yet represent a serious threat.

"We always see early adopters trying to find a way to attack new technology right away, as we did with 32-bit, so it's not surprising to see this," Friedrichs said. "But we do expect to see more of these, as 64-bit technology becomes more prominent."


Read Article

#2 wawadave

wawadave

    Advanced Member

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts

Posted 27 May 2004 - 08:02 PM

if its in the lab won,t be long till its in the wild!
<b>MYTH!!!!
Putting quotes around posts does not protect you from copy right infringement.</b>
<img src="http://img54.photobu...r_wawadave.gif" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />

#3 SpywareDestroyer

SpywareDestroyer

    Member

  • Full Member
  • Pip
  • 51 posts

Posted 31 May 2004 - 01:23 PM

I think that the virus makers are trying to target more 64 bit computers now.

#4 Tuxedo Jack

Tuxedo Jack

    Creator of TuxPE, a Cat5-o'-9-Tails, Etherkillers, and more

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,757 posts

Posted 31 May 2004 - 09:44 PM

It would make sense; 64-bit machines have more processing power and therefore are more valuable to their botnets and "distributed computing networks" than common 32-bit machines.
Signature file is under revision. This will be back shortly.

#5 Mr. Swenk

Mr. Swenk

    Co-Owner of TechnoFusionElite.com

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 271 posts

Posted 31 May 2004 - 11:03 PM

Could someone clarify me as to whats the difference?
I dont personaly know that difference.
Useful Links
Cleaners
Ad-Aware CWShredder Hijack This!
Sasser virus Removal
Sasser Removal

Proudly Developped CWS Search in VB6 and VB7(.NET)


Co-Owner of TechnoFusionElite.com > Personal Domain

#6 Tuxedo Jack

Tuxedo Jack

    Creator of TuxPE, a Cat5-o'-9-Tails, Etherkillers, and more

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,757 posts

Posted 31 May 2004 - 11:37 PM

They're different CPU architectures.

64-bit allows the machine to address more memory and hard drive space; 32-bit allows it to access less.

64-bit's max RAM capacity is something like 8GB, I think; check with Apple.
Signature file is under revision. This will be back shortly.

#7 Mr. Swenk

Mr. Swenk

    Co-Owner of TechnoFusionElite.com

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 271 posts

Posted 01 June 2004 - 10:22 PM

8GB ram!! WOW!

I am extremely impressed! I wish I could change the one in my laptop, but unfortunatly its a rental, and I still have 1 year with it, until I get my new rental.
Useful Links
Cleaners
Ad-Aware CWShredder Hijack This!
Sasser virus Removal
Sasser Removal

Proudly Developped CWS Search in VB6 and VB7(.NET)


Co-Owner of TechnoFusionElite.com > Personal Domain




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Member of ASAP and UNITE
Support SpywareInfo Forum - click the button