Guess what. Contracts are not binding to someone who doesn't read them. Don't believe me? Just ask this judge.
http://news.com.com/...ml?tag=nefd.top
Judge rules privacy policy unenforceable
Started by Mike, Jun 16 2004 12:39 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Mike
-
- Emeritus
-
- 514 posts
Dark Lord of SWI
Posted 16 June 2004 - 12:39 PM
SpywareInfo: How are you gentlemen?? All your base are belong to us!!
Spyware: What you say!!
SpywareInfo: You have no chance to survive. Make your time!
Spyware: What you say!!
SpywareInfo: You have no chance to survive. Make your time!
#2
cnm
-
- Administrators
-
- 25,317 posts
Mother Lion of SWI
Posted 16 June 2004 - 03:23 PM
Glad of this, anyway:
Church said the decision would not prevent the Federal Trade Commission from acting against the airline or a Web site vendor that violated its posted privacy policy. Last week, the FTC promised that at least one such action was coming down the pike.
Microsoft MVP Windows Security 2005-2006
How camest thou in this pickle? -- William Shakespeare:(1564-1616)
The various helper groups here
UNITE
#3
wawadave
-
- Full Member
-
- 126 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 16 June 2004 - 10:38 PM
i would think privicy is going down hill. and its a very steep hill at that.
jmho
jmho
<b>MYTH!!!!
Putting quotes around posts does not protect you from copy right infringement.</b>
<img src="http://img54.photobu...r_wawadave.gif" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />
Putting quotes around posts does not protect you from copy right infringement.</b>
<img src="http://img54.photobu...r_wawadave.gif" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
