Jump to content


Photo

U.S. House subcommittee approves spyware bill


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 mr bones

mr bones

    Member

  • Emeritus
  • Pip
  • 66 posts

Posted 18 June 2004 - 03:02 PM

http://maccentral.ma...4/06/17/spyact/

#2 Mike

Mike

    Dark Lord of SWI

  • Emeritus
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 514 posts

Posted 18 June 2004 - 03:11 PM

I don't know whether to be pleased or not.

I'm glad Congress is willing to outlaw spyware, but Bono's bill would make a bad law. It defines spyware (badly) then regulates its own definition. It leaves out some of the worst offenders. It also preempts similar laws by the individual states.

I much prefer the Senate's SPYBLOCK Act.
SpywareInfo: How are you gentlemen?? All your base are belong to us!!
Spyware: What you say!!
SpywareInfo: You have no chance to survive. Make your time!

#3 AplusWebMaster

AplusWebMaster

    AplusWebMaster

  • SWI Friend
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,570 posts

Posted 18 June 2004 - 07:50 PM

FYI...

US House Panel Approves Bill to Combat Spyware
- http://www.reuters.c...storyID=5450466
June 17, 2004
(A House Energy and Commerce subcommittee has approved a bill that would require spyware providers to alert users before installing new softwares onto their machines and to make spyware easily removable. The bill would also authorize the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to levy millions in fines for keystroke logging and identity theft. The FTC has objected to the bill, saying it already has the laws necessary to address spyware, and that the new law may also affect legitimate software based on similar technology. The bill's backers say it has been modified to address such concerns. Representative Cliff Stearns (R-Florida), chair of the subcommittee, says the aim of the bill is to outlaw the most egregious spyware practices while protecting legitimate uses.)

Legitimate uses? Of spyware? Only politicians could come up with an answer like that!

.The machine has no brain.
 ......... Use your own.
Browser check for updates here.
YOU need to defend against -all- vulnerabilities.
Hacks only need to find -1- to get in...
.


#4 wawadave

wawadave

    Advanced Member

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts

Posted 20 June 2004 - 04:08 PM

grease there palms they will pass what ever you want! :evilgrin:
<b>MYTH!!!!
Putting quotes around posts does not protect you from copy right infringement.</b>
<img src="http://img54.photobu...r_wawadave.gif" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />

#5 Muriel

Muriel

    scholar of crapware's demise

  • Full Member
  • Pip
  • 97 posts

Posted 20 June 2004 - 10:35 PM

This initial approval does little to impress me. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I suspect some of the larger software developers with the funds to do so have "influenced" the situation. Of course, politicians tend to have a narrow focus and be generally ignorant on many of the issues they make decisions on.

It's kinda like the issue of global warming. A handful of groups have been assigned to "determine" if this very real problem is genuine, and have reported to D.C. that yes, it is an issue that should be a concern. However, that isn't the answer that the folks they report to want to hear, so they send out another team to do the same study all over again, hoping for a different answer (which won't come).

It will be similar here, I suspect. Many people still scoff at the notion of a firewall or antivirus software. Spyware? What's that? Sad, that's what.

The Act Mike mentioned above is SPYBLOCK Act, S. 2145, so anyone that reads this please take the time either to mention it to others or contact your Senators, as well. When the people speak loud enough, closed doors and windows are no longer effective.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Member of ASAP and UNITE
Support SpywareInfo Forum - click the button