Enterprise anti-virus software
Posted 28 August 2005 - 09:12 AM
Posted 28 August 2005 - 09:20 AM
Spyware Times - Security news and support at your fingertips.
Member of the Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals and the Unified Network of Instructors and Trusted Eliminators.
Removal Tools: HijackThis | CWShredder | LSP Fix | Pocket KillBox | Ad-aware SE Personal | Spybot S&D
Anti-virus Programs: AVG Anti-virus | avast! Home Edition
Firewalls: ZoneAlarm | Kerio Personal Firewall | Sygate Personal Firewall
Prevention Tools: SpywareBlaster | SpywareGuard | MVPS Hosts File | IE-SPYAD
Online Scanners: Housecall | Panda Active Scan
File Scanners: Jotti's malware scan | Virus Total
Excellent Articles: So how do I get infected in the first place? by Tony Klein | Rogue/Suspect Anti-Spyware Products and Websites by Eric L. Howes | Passwords and how to create them by Bobbi Flekman | Making Internet Explorer Safer by Bobbi Flekman | Stopping Viruses, Worms And Trojan Horses by Bobbi Flekman
Please help support this site with a donation.
"For I can do everything through Christ, who gives me strength." - Philippians 4:13 (NLT)
Posted 28 August 2005 - 10:18 AM
I have no complaints, or desire to try another anti-virus.
This program was chosen after much testing as the ONLY alternative to NOD32...
The scan speed (manual) is less. The resource use (footprint) is slightly more in background use, (not hugely significant to ME).
KAV scans slower than NOD32. On virus updates it's a toss up. Both are excellent. On certain trojan exploits, KAV is slightly more robust than NOD32. Both have an exemplary record on virus ID in the wild.
As I am experienced and comfortable with the record of KAV, I have no desire to change programs. It's trustworthy, robust, and rapidly updated.
To the best of my knowledge, there is NO other choice, which disregards these two scan engines, that exceeds their performance. There is, however, a new program (not tested yet by me) .. that uses BitDefender engine *and* KAV engine. While it would seem this would slow performance, it also offers a 2nd set of virus defs, and heuristic filters, that likely would marginally improve recognition of the newest exploits.
My recommendation would be for anyone considering a program purchase: Nod32 for freestanding, espcecially if there was a resource bottleneck on a workstation.. and KAV for network use, (as I know for a fact it's stable and reliable under those conditions)..
As both programs have a free trial, and I have received responses from both companies to emails, my sincere recommendation is to try both programs in an enterprise setting to make an informed decision. It seems to me that the speed of performance is less significant than the reliability of the protection.
Were I the person responsible for an enterprise's security, I would not make a decision based entirely (nor even mostly) on scanning speed.
Edited by mitchshrader, 28 August 2005 - 10:27 AM.
First, Do No Harm!
Second, Use Known Good (canned) Fixes when possible.
Third, Get Help From Others when not positive of your answer.
Fourth, Do Not Recommend complex procedures without verifying the skill of the user to accomplish necessary tasks.
Fifth, Specify optional removals as 'Users Choice'.
Sixth, Give Credit for info and assistance.
Last, BE POLITE. Especially when it is most difficult.